article

Unraveling the Claims Against Macron and Kirks Fate

5 min read

Off Air, But Not Proven: What Candace Owens Claimed About Macron—and What the Evidence Actually Shows

Short answer: Candace Owens did pause her show. Her explosive claims that French President Emmanuel Macron plotted to kill her and was tied to Charlie Kirk’s death remain unverified, and current official records point elsewhere.

Now for the part that matters: prosecutors in Utah have charged a 22-year-old local man in Kirk’s killing and say they will seek the death penalty—no mention of the Macrons, French units, or any foreign plot.

The headline-grabbing claim vs. the paper trail

On X, Owens said she was taking her show “off air this week” and alleged a sweeping conspiracy: a $1.5 million hit ordered by Macron, a French special-operations link (GIGN/Foreign Legion), even “one Israeli” on the supposed team. She said she reported it to the White House and U.S. counterterrorism officials, who “confirmed receipt.”

What we found when we followed the documents instead of the drama:

The lawsuit looming in the background

While Owens’ new claims ricocheted online, an older fight moved through court: on July 23, 2025, Emmanuel and Brigitte Macron filed a 22-count defamation suit in Delaware. The complaint says Owens repeatedly and falsely claimed Brigitte Macron “is in fact a man,” including in an eight‑part series called “Becoming Brigitte.” (Coverage and complaint details: https://www.cnbc.com/2025/07/23/france-macron-brigitte-candace-owens-defamation-transgender-lawsuit.html?utm_source=openai)

That timing matters. The assassination allegations arrived in the middle of a high‑stakes defamation case—raising the temperature in an already incendiary dispute.

What’s true, what isn’t, and what we don’t know

How we checked

Why this matters

Assassination plots make headlines. Court filings make history. In the Kirk case, prosecutors have put a name, charges, and a capital‑punishment notice on the record. In the Macron–Owens feud, a defamation complaint is now before a court. Owens’ newer allegations, by contrast, have not been backed by public evidence from any investigative body.

Key corrections and clarifications

What we’re still watching

Bottom line: The show is off. The evidence isn’t there. Until law enforcement or court records say otherwise, Owens’ most dramatic allegations remain just that—allegations.

Sources:

If you want, I can pull the Delaware docket next and map the timeline of filings, exhibits, and claims in detail.