article

Unpacking Trumps Proposal on Epstein Investigation

5 min read

No, Trump Didn’t Ask for an “Epstein Special Prosecutor.”

But he did call the case a “hoax,” rip into his own supporters, and shrug, “It’s boring.”

Curious yet? Here’s how a single unproven quote sprinted around the internet, collided with several hard facts, and left a trail of confusion about Jeffrey Epstein, Donald Trump, and a supposed new investigation.


The Viral Claim vs. Reality

Claim that lit the fuse:
“Trump tells John Solomon he wants a special prosecutor to probe the ‘Jeffrey Epstein hoax.’”

What our digging found:
There is no evidence—no video, audio, transcript, press-pool note, or even an off-the-record whisper—showing Trump ever said it. John Solomon and conservative pundits have certainly floated the idea of a Bondi-appointed prosecutor, but the words never came from Trump’s mouth.

Verdict: Unsubstantiated. Until a recording appears, file it under “still looking.”


So What Did Trump Really Say About Epstein?

Over a frantic 48-hour stretch in mid-July 2025, the former president managed to:

  1. Brand the entire Epstein saga a “Jeffrey Epstein Hoax.”
    Truth Social post, 16 July 2025.
    Source: Al Jazeera

  2. Call his own believers “weaklings” who got “duped.”
    Same post; reproduced by Newsmax and others.

  3. Tell reporters the case is “sordid but boring” and he can’t fathom the interest.
    Tarmac gaggle, Joint Base Andrews, 15 July 2025.
    Source: RealClearPolitics video

  4. Lament in the Oval Office that he’d “lost faith” in some supporters over the issue.
    16 July 2025 pool spray.
    Source: Washington Post

In short: plenty of fire-breathing quotes, but none about appointing a special prosecutor.


Where the Rumor Was Born

The confusion traces back to a 14 July 2025 segment on Real America’s Voice. John Solomon, citing unnamed FBI sources, said a “grand-conspiracy” inquiry had opened and speculated that it “could allow Attorney General Pam Bondi to tap a special prosecutor.” Steve Bannon loved the idea, listeners ran with it, and within hours blog headlines morphed speculation into “Trump orders special prosecutor.”

Important nuance:
• Solomon ≠ Trump.
• Speculation ≠ announcement.


Confirmed Facts the Original Story Got Right

Even flawed articles can contain accurate pieces. Here are the elements that check out:


Claims Still in the Fog

ClaimStatusWhy We’re Not Sure Yet
White House “dismissed any notion” of pardoning Ghislaine MaxwellNot confirmedNo on-record statement found in July 2025 briefings
Trump personally requested a special prosecutorUnsubstantiatedZero primary evidence; rumor originated with pundits

If you stumble on a recording that flips these boxes to “confirmed,” our inbox is open.


Why This Matters

  1. Information Cascades: A single speculative remark can snowball into “breaking news” once repeated enough times—especially on social media built for speed, not accuracy.

  2. Political Whiplash: Trump’s base has long believed the Epstein files might expose a bipartisan web of elites. Hearing their champion suddenly call it “boring” and a “hoax” was a gut punch; the false promise of a special prosecutor briefly offered hope, then vanished.

  3. Trust Erosion: Each viral misquote chips away at public faith—either in Trump, in media, or in both. People end up asking, “Who’s lying to me today?”


A Peek Inside the Fact-Check Toolbox

To separate rumor from reality we:

Transparency note: Should a new audio file emerge later, we’ll update.


Takeaways for Readers

Double-check the speaker. Headlines often blur “X said” into “Y suggested.”
Follow the source chain. If five sites cite each other but no one links primary evidence, beware.
Remember that “unverified” is not “false”—it just means we don’t know yet.


Quick FAQ

Q: Is there any new investigation into Epstein’s network at all?
A: The FBI’s “grand-conspiracy” case Solomon talked about is reported but not publicly confirmed. Even if it exists, it was not requested by Trump.

Q: Could Trump still appoint a special prosecutor later?
A: In theory, sure; legally possible. But as of today, there is no announcement.

Q: Did Trump really say he no longer wants support from believers in an Epstein cover-up?
A: Yes. His Truth Social rant on 16 July 2025 reads: “Let these weaklings continue forward … I don’t want their support anymore!”


The Bottom Line

The internet’s latest “bombshell” about Trump ordering an Epstein special prosecutor turns out to be a dud. What’s real is far stranger: a former president publicly scolding his own loyalists for caring about a case he now calls dull—while the Justice Department he once championed quietly slams the archive door shut.

Stay curious, stay skeptical, and keep following the receipts.