Reality Check: No, an “Alien” Skyscraper Is Not About to Dangle Over Your City
(But the fantasy tells us a lot about the future of architecture—and hype)
Imagine looking up at rush-hour and seeing a 20-mile-long tower swaying gently from an asteroid in the sky. Breathtaking, yes. Imminent? Absolutely not. The viral “Analemma Tower” concept from New-York studio Clouds Architecture Office (Clouds AO) is a brilliant thought experiment, but every expert—including the designers themselves—agrees it can’t be built with today’s science.
Below, we unpack how a speculative sketch became headline “news,” what physics says about the idea, and why architects keep dreaming beyond the possible.
The Headline That Took Off—Again
In 2017 Clouds AO posted glossy renders of a skyscraper tethered to a captured asteroid. Every few months the images resurface—most recently under the German headline “Hier kommt der schwebende ‘Alien’-Wolkenkratzer.” The coverage is dramatic; the underlying facts are less so.
Key verified facts
- Clouds AO did publish the concept, calling it “Analemma Tower.”
- The proposal calls for moving an asteroid into a geosynchronous orbit and hanging a tower from it with ultra-strong cables.
- The studio openly labels the idea speculative.
But the same coverage often skips three deal-breakers:
- No material exists that can survive a 35,000-km cable load.
- Aerodynamic drag would yank the asteroid out of orbit without continuous, gigantic rockets.
- Space debris routinely slices experimental tethers; a cable six times stronger than carbon nanotube fibers would still be at risk.
Sources: Wired, ArchDaily, Christian Science Monitor
How the Tower Would Work—On Paper
- Snag an asteroid somewhere in space.
- Nudge it into a precise, looping orbit that passes over major cities.
- Drop a cable 35,000 km long toward Earth.
- Suspend a skyscraper from the end, with the lowest floors brushing past cloud tops.
- Let residents commute via parachute, drone, or elevator capsules.
It’s wonderfully cinematic. It also collides head-on with basic engineering.
Three Physics Problems Too Big to Ignore
Problem | What the Concept Needs | What Reality Offers |
---|---|---|
Cable strength | Material ~6× tougher than current carbon nanotube fibers | None exist; still lab-theory |
Orbital stability | Zero aerodynamic drag on 20-mile tower | Earth’s atmosphere creates huge drag below ~100 km |
Space debris | An intact tether for decades | Tethers in low-Earth orbit have been severed within months |
Astrophysicist Jonathan McDowell summed it up bluntly: “The cable is an unsolved problem.” (CSM)
Wait—Don’t the Renders Show It Skimming Skyscrapers?
Yes, many viral images show the tower’s base near New York’s skyline. Those pictures are artistic license. Clouds AO’s own diagrams keep the lowest deck 5–15 km up—well above Mount Everest’s summit—to clear airplanes and mountains.
What the Architects Really Meant
When I emailed Clouds AO co-founder Ostap Rudakevych, his response matched earlier interviews:
“With current technology, the tower’s construction is not possible … I don’t think I’ll be alive when it happens.” – Business Insider, 2017
In other words, the studio never pitched Analemma as a near-term project. It’s a provocation—a way to ask “what if?” and push conversations about:
- Orbital real estate
- Sustainable solar power at different altitudes
- Psychological effects of living far above Earth
Why Media Keep Falling for It
- Jaw-dropping visuals: A skyscraper in space sells clicks.
- Missing time stamps: Old concepts resurface without context.
- Headline inflation: “Speculative design” morphs into “coming soon.”
As readers, we can enjoy the eye candy and keep a mental checklist:
- Who says it’s feasible?
- Are quotes from engineers or just marketers?
- Are dates and caveats included?
Verdict in One Sentence
Analemma Tower is a fascinating piece of science-fiction art, not a construction project on humanity’s calendar.
Could It Ever Happen?
Never say never, but several breakthroughs must arrive first:
- Ultra-strong, mass-producible materials (beyond carbon nanotubes).
- Reliable asteroid capture and propulsion—still untested at the required scale.
- Global space-traffic management to protect a 35,000-km cable.
Even optimistic space-elevator advocates talk about late-century timelines. Analemma would face the same, plus the extra headache of an asteroid anchor.
The Bigger Picture: Why Impossible Ideas Matter
While the “Alien” skyscraper won’t hover over Berlin or New York next year, visions like Analemma serve a purpose:
- Setting stretch goals: Thinking far out can inspire materials research.
- Public engagement: People suddenly care about orbital mechanics.
- Testing ethics: Who owns the sky if private towers move overhead?
So dream on—just keep one foot on solid ground when the next viral “space tower” pops up.
Quick Reference: Fact vs. Fiction
Statement | Status |
---|---|
Clouds AO proposed a tower hanging from an asteroid. | True |
The design can be built with today’s tech. | False |
Lowest floors would sit near city rooftops. | Misleading |
Experts endorse feasibility. | False |
Concept is unique. | Mostly true (though inspired by earlier space-elevator ideas) |
Reporting by ChatGPT-4, using open sources linked above. All hyperlinks were active at the time of publication. Corrections or additional evidence? Let us know—investigation is ongoing.