article

Exploring Candace Owens Bold Macron Allegation

5 min read

Did the Macrons hire an “assassination squad” to kill Candace Owens? Here’s what the evidence shows

Short answer: There’s no evidence beyond Candace Owens’s own posts. No government or law‑enforcement agency has confirmed her explosive claim. But the story is bigger than one viral thread—it sits at the intersection of a high‑stakes defamation fight, a political assassination case, and the slippery math of social media “views.”

The viral night and the missing proof

In a late‑night burst of posts on X, Owens said a “high‑ranking” French official warned her that France’s first couple paid for her assassination, allegedly with help from “at least one Israeli.” She linked the supposed plot to the murder of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, even naming a French Foreign Legion “13th brigade” connection.

What we found: The posts are real and were amplified by multiple outlets. What we didn’t find: any official confirmation from France, Israel, or U.S. authorities. Not one. Media roundups echo this same gap—claims without corroboration. Sources: Mediaite; Primetimer; EURweb.

What’s verified vs. what isn’t

Here’s the clean split.

How we checked

We reviewed:

Where possible, we linked to primary or official sources (Reuters for the lawsuit; Utah County and AP/PBS for the Kirk case). Where only her posts exist, we say so.

The tension under the headlines

Two threads get tangled here:

  1. A personal feud turned legal.
    Owens has been in open conflict with the Macrons over claims about France’s First Lady. That escalated into a July defamation suit alleging a “campaign of global humiliation.” Source: Reuters.

  2. A real murder case vs. online theories.
    Charlie Kirk was killed. A suspect has been charged. Prosecutors say he acted alone. Owens says otherwise and now links that to a supposed state‑backed plot. The official record doesn’t match her story. Sources: PBS; AP; Utah County; AOL.

This mismatch is the core contradiction: Owens’s claims require a multinational conspiracy. The available evidence points to a lone‑actor prosecution.

About those viral numbers

Owens’s late‑night posts traveled far. But “views” on X can mean many things (impressions across feeds, not just clicks), and counts change quickly. We found:

Bottom line: “Nearly 40 million” is unconfirmed and likely a rolling snapshot, not a verified audience size. Sources: Mediaite; Primetimer; New York Post.

What would actually prove her claim

Extraordinary claims need extraordinary documentation. Here’s what would move this from allegation to evidence:

None of that exists publicly today.

The quotes, in context

Ridicule poured in from commentators like David Bahnsen and Mike Doran—accurate quotes we verified via Mediaite. But scorn is not evidence either way; it just shows how far and how fast the story spread online. Source: Mediaite.

The bottom line

Until then, treat this like a thriller without a second act: a dramatic setup, a viral chase, and—so far—no proof the plot is real.